摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在口腔种植临床治疗中,骨增量尤其是垂直骨增量一直是治疗中的难点和挑战。虽然目前作为“金标准”的块状骨移植技术以及多种骨增量技术被广泛应用和研究,但是各种技术也有一定的局限性,目前尚无广泛被认可的最佳垂直骨增量技术。因此,对垂直骨增量技术的探究也需要不断进行。本文将介绍一种目前仍较新的垂直骨增量技术——栅栏技术,这是一种将钛板弯制成型固定于骨缺损区域支撑成骨空间,配合使用可吸收胶原膜的引导骨再生技术。作为一种新技术,不可避免地存在一些缺陷和限制,本文同样对这项技术提出了改进,采用数字化设计,将流程简化和标准化,为垂直骨增量增添一种新的思路和方法。

关键词:

垂直骨增量,

数字化技术,

栅栏技术

Abstract: Bone augmentation, especially vertical bone augmentation, has always been a difficulty and challenge in the clinical treatment of implantation. Although the bone block technique, which is now considered as the “golden standard” for massive bone grafting, and various bone augmentation techniques have been widely used and studied, every technique has some limitations, and there is no widely recognized optimal vertical bone augmentation technique at present. Therefore, the exploration of vertical bone augmentation technology also needs to be continued. In this paper, we will introduce a new vertical bone augmentation technique, the fence technique, which is a kind of guided bone regeneration technique by bending a titanium plate and fixing it on the bone defect area to support the osteogenic space. As a new technique, it inevitably has some disadvantages and limitations. In this paper, we also put forward an improvement of this technique, adopting full digital design and process to simplify and standardize this technique, adding a new idea and method for vertical bone augmentation..

Key words:

Vertical bone augmentation,

Digital technique,

Fence technique

引用本文

满毅,等刘菁晶. 一种用于重建严重吸收牙槽嵴的技术介绍与改良思路：栅栏技术[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 349-353. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.003

Man Yi, Liu Jingjing. Introduction of a technique for severely atrophic alveolar ridge reconstruction: modified fence technique[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(6): 349-353.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.003.

使用本文

0

/

/

推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文:

https://zgkqzzxzz.cndent.com/CN/10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.003

https://zgkqzzxzz.cndent.com/CN/Y2021/V26/I6/349

参考文献

[1] Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, et al.The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering[J]. Ann Periodontol, 2000,5(1):119-128. DOI: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119.[2] Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M, et al. Group 1 ITI consensus report: the influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:69-77. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13342.[3] Bitaraf T, Keshtkar A, Rokn AR, et al.Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(4):796-812. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12774.[4] Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL.Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009,24(3):502-510.[5] Wang HL, Boyapati L.“PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration[J]. Implant Dent, 2006,15(1):8-17. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f.[6] Atef M, Osman AH, Hakam M.Autogenous interpositional block graft vs onlay graft for horizontal ridge augmentation in the mandible[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(4):678-685. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12809.[7] Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernández-Barbero JE, et al.Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008,19(8):755-759. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.x.[8] El Zahwy M, Taha S, Mounir R, et al.Assessment of vertical ridge augmentation and marginal bone loss using autogenous onlay vs inlay grafting techniques with simultaneous implant placement in the anterior maxillary esthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(6):1140-1147. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12849.[9] Urban IA, Montero E, Monje A, et al. Effectiveness of vertical ridge augmentation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019,46 Suppl 21:319-339. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13061.[10] Konstantinidis I, Kumar T, Kher U, et al.Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2015,19(2):553-559. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1268-4.[11] Ciocca L, Lizio G, Baldissara P, et al.Prosthetically CAD-CAM-guided bone augmentation of atrophic jaws using customized titanium mesh: preliminary results of an open prospective study[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2018,44(2):131-137. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00125.[12] Zhang T, Zhang T, Cai X.The application of a newly designed L-shaped titanium mesh for GBR with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: a retrospective case series study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(5):862-872. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12726.[13] Li L, Wang C, Li X, et al.Research on the dimensional accuracy of customized bone augmentation combined with 3D-printing individualized titanium mesh: a retrospective case series study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2021,23(1): 5-18. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12966.[14] Rocchietta I, Simion M, Hoffmann M, et al.Vertical bone augmentation with an autogenous block or particles in combination with guided bone regeneration: a clinical and histological preliminary study in humans[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016,18(1):19-29. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12267.[15] Merli M, Migani M, Esposito M.Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts: resorbable barriers supported by ostheosynthesis plates versus titanium-reinforced barriers. a preliminary report of a blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007,22(3): 373-382.[16] Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G, et al.Autogenous bone versus deproteinised bovine bone matrix in 1-stage lateral sinus floor elevation in the severely atrophied maxilla: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2013,6(1):27-37.[17] Merli M, Mariotti G, Moscatelli M, et al.Fence technique for localized three-dimensional bone augmentation: a technical description and case reports[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2015,35(1):57-64. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2029.[18] Merli M, Mariotti G, Pagliaro U, et al.The fence technique: 100% autogenous bone graft vs 50% deproteinized bovine bone matrix and 50% autogenous bone graft. a histologic randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2020,40(2):181-190. DOI: 10.11607/prd.4116.[19] Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, et al. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26 Suppl 11:69-76. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12638.[20] Chiapasco M, Casentini P.Horizontal bone-augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: prosthetically guided regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018,77(1):213-240. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12219.

相关文章 5

[1]

李效宇, 何捷, 王雪珂, 段静旖, 葛畅, 孟维艳. 应用骨胶原结合帐篷技术行上颌后牙连续缺失垂直骨增量一例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 97-101.

[2]

章雯, 顾新华. 侧壁开窗上颌窦底提升的骨窗设计研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(5): 334-338.

[3]

熊佳璧, 孙为, 施斌. 口腔种植治疗中的数字化数据采集技术[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2): 114-119.

[4]

王星星, 陈旭涛, 王蕾, 施少杰, 赵国强, 赵文爽, 宋应亮. 伴慢性上颌窦炎上颌窦底提升的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(1): 13-17.

[5]

康博, 潘颖菁, 温玉洁, 杜丽娟, 谢倩艺. 钛网结合无机牛骨在磨牙区种植同期垂直骨增量的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(3): 106-109.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

摘要